Up: Astronomy 9 Lecture Notes
ASTRONOMY 9: HISTORY OF COSMOLOGY
Handout #24
J. E. Baker
UC Berkeley, Spring 2000
The Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB)
- Observational Discovery
- 1941: Adams and McKellar measure ``temperature of space'' to
be about 2.3 K (significance not realized until 1965)
- Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson (Bell Labs, NJ)
- 1964: Detect faint excess noise in a radio antenna horn,
K
- 1965: Great efforts to identify the source, even scraping off
the pigeon droppings!
- 1978: Penzias and Wilson awarded Nobel Prize for discovery of
the cosmic background
- Interpretation
- Gamow and collaborators (1948, 1953): relic microwave
radiation from the Big Bang should permeate the universe,
K (largely unknown)
- Russian cosmologists (early 60s) suggest looking for this
radiation (not noticed nor pursued)
- Princeton cosmologists (Peebles) independently discover and
improve on Gamow's result
- Dicke, Roll, and Wilkinson (Princeton) start constructing a
receiver in 1964 to look for the CMB
- Learn of Penzias and Wilson's problem, and realize they have
seen the CMB!
- CMB is a ``fossil relic'' of an early time when the universe
was hot and dense, the ``echo'' of the Big Bang
- Recall that looking out in space is looking back in time
- Eventually, arrive at a point where the universe becomes
opaque: a ``wall'' behind which we cannot see
- This happens when electrons and protons first combine to
form neutral hydrogen
- Free electrons can absorb lots of different wavelengths of
light, so dense early universe was opaque
- Bound electrons can only absorb special wavelengths, so
universe later becomes (mostly) transparent
- Transition occurs at
,
K,
300,000 years
- Radiation at this time was mostly optical/UV, redshifted by
factor of 1100 as universe expands, so becomes microwave
(
mm)
- Note CMB contributes about 1% of TV ``static''
- CMB is very difficult to interpret as anything other
than a remnant of the big bang: death of steady state theory!
- Learning about Cosmology from the CMB
- The CMB is very smooth (isotropic), almost exactly the
same temperature in all directions
- So the matter in the universe was also very smooth, almost
exactly the same density at all locations
- Only later do the tiny inhomogeneities develop into stars,
galaxies, clusters of galaxies, etc.
- Doppler Anisotropy
- Note there is a special frame of rest defined by the
CMB!
- If you are moving with respect to this frame, can always
tell, because CMB will look hotter (shorter
)
ahead of
you and colder behind you (Doppler effect)
- Earth has a motion of several hundred km/s, leads to
temperature difference of about 1 part in 10-3
- First measured in 1970s, no cosmological significance
- Easy to subtract the Doppler pattern, look for
original anisotropies imprinted in the background
- Search for Anisotropy
- Anisotropies (except Doppler) reflect tiny density
variations in the early universe, sound waves traveling
through the baryons (ordinary matter)
- Ground-based experiments could not detect any
anisotropy down to 1 part in 105!
- Problem for early ideas about galaxy formation: needed 1
part in 103
- Resolution: most of the mass is non-baryonic
(weird, does not interact with CMB photons) dark matter
- Normal matter (baryons) is prevented from growing into
condensed structures by CMB radiation
- Dark matter can start to grow earlier, so initial
variations can be smaller
- Lots of other evidence for dark matter, too...
- Baryons (normal matter) only make up
of total!
- COBE satellite (1989-1992)
- Cosmic Background Explorer
- Measures perfect blackbody spectrum for CMB, just as
predicted! T=2.728 K
- Finally detects variations in the temperature at level of 1
part in 105
- ``Seeds'' of the structures in the universe today!
- Makes a map of (almost) the whole sky, but low resolution
(blurry)
- Measuring the curvature of the universe
- Can predict exactly how big the sound waves in the early
universe should be when universe becomes transparent
- Measure the spectrum of these waves, and compare to
prediction
- If space is curved, acts like a lens
- If geometry is flat, typical structures should look about
in size
- If geometry is spherical (closed), light rays converge,
makes the structures look bigger
- If geometry is hyperbolic, light rays diverge, makes
structures look smaller
- Define
to be the matter density as a
fraction of the critical density:
- If there is no
,
means
spherical and recollapse,
means hyperbolic and
expand forever,
means flat and expand forever
- Similarly, there is
for the fraction of the
critical energy density contributed by
- Geometry is determined by total
(+
's for anything else in the universe)
- If there is
,
geometry does not determine fate
- BOOMERANG (Antarctic balloon telescope)
- Recently made high-resolution image of CMB (in a small part
of sky)
- Gets strong constraint that total
is close to 1,
universe is (nearly) flat!
- Combine with data from supernovae
- With
,
distant supernovae at a given z should
be more distant (so look fainter) than if no
- 1998 result of the year: supernovae do show
strong evidence for an accelerating universe!
- Future
- Ground-based telescopes in high desert sites will improve
constraints on cosmological models
- Satellites over the next decade (MAP, PLANCK) will obtain
sharp images of the CMB over the whole sky!
- May be able to pin down precisely what kind of cosmological
model applies to our universe
- We will understand the state of the universe at
extremely well
- Cosmologists will turn attention to later times (how do
galaxies form?) and earlier times (towards the creation itself)
- Current best model for the universe
-
,
(flat)
seems consistent with most data
- If
does not do something strange in the future,
universe will continue to expand forever!
- Future is infinite, but will be very bleak if acceleration
continues
- Why is the sky dark at night?
- Actually a very profound question!
- Rules out old idea of infinite static universe with infinitely
old stars
- Called ``Olbers' paradox'' (1820s), but known since Kepler
- Every line of sight should intersect surface of a star, so sky
should be as bright as the sun!
- Two main reasons why this is not the case (first is most
important):
- 1.
- Observable part of the universe is finite since
light travels at finite speed and universe has finite age
(and/or is expanding), so most lines of sight do not intersect a
star (yet)
- 2.
- Energy from distant stars is redshifted by expansion
- With the CMB there is another answer: the sky is bright!
(If you had microwave eyes, or went back in time to
)
- In this case it is the expansion that resolves the ``paradox''
- The Universe and the Heat Death
- 2nd law of thermodynamics says entropy increases
- Late 19th c. physicists figured the universe must be
``winding down'', on its way to heat death
- But entropy contained in CMB is much larger than that being
generated by stars, people, etc.
- Measured roughly by ratio of number of photons to number of
particles of ordinary matter (baryons):
- So actually, the heat death has already mostly happened!
- From nucleosynthesis calculation of deuterium abundance, we
get
where
h=H0/(100 km/s/Mpc) and
is fraction of critical density contributed by baryons
- If
then
is only 4%
- Much evidence suggests that total matter density is between
20% and 40% of critical, so must be a lot of weird
(non-baryonic) matter!
This document was generated using the
LaTeX2HTML translator Version 98.1p1 release (March 2nd, 1998)
Copyright © 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997,
Nikos Drakos,
Computer Based Learning Unit, University of Leeds.
The command line arguments were:
latex2html -up_url ../../notes.html -up_title Astronomy 9 Lecture Notes -split 0 -t Astronomy 9 (Spring 2000): Handout 24 -dir /coma8/jbaker/public_html/courses/ay9/week13/handout24 handout24.tex.
The translation was initiated by jonathan baker on 2000-05-01
Up: Astronomy 9 Lecture Notes
jonathan baker
2000-05-01