Up: Astronomy 9 Lecture Notes
ASTRONOMY 9: HISTORY OF COSMOLOGY
Handout #13
J. E. Baker
UC Berkeley, Spring 2000
Copernicus: A Reluctant Revolutionary
- 1.
- Nicolas Copernicus (1473-1543, Poland)
- Moves Sun back to (well, near) center
- Revolutionary implications:
- Earth is just another planet going round the sun
- Demolishes Aristotelian spheres and walled-in medieval
Christian universe
- Universe becomes vast (lack of parallax)
- Erases division of earthly vs. celestial realms
- Aristotelian physics unsatisfactory: where is the center?
- Breaks the close link between man, god, and universe
- Loss of stability, rest, order
- The Greeks did not discover all scientific knowledge
- Idea that our place in universe is not special: still called
the Copernican Principle
- But these revolutionary ideas were not trumpeted (or even
consciously recognized) by Copernicus! Merely implied by
his work
- Heliocentric idea at first welcomed by relatively
open-minded Church! Big trouble only decades after death of
Copernicus, around 1600
- Copernicus was conservative, backward-looking, unwitting
instigator of his revolution
- Last Aristotelian of the great scientists, at home in the
medieval cosmos
- By standards of his day, Copernicus was a relic of an earlier
world view!
- Aristotelian physics long called into question by Bacon,
Oresme, Cusa, ...
- Aristarchus' heliocentric ideas never really forgotten, and
were discussed openly prior to Copernicus
- Winds of humanist Renaissance blowing from Italy, little
effect on Copernicus despite his studies at Bologna
- Still answering Plato's challenge to ``save the phenomena'',
not trying to revolutionize cosmology
- Blind faith in ancient authority
- Data mostly from Ptolemy
- Only 27 recorded observations of his own, didn't bother to
get modern instruments
- Spent a lot of energy accounting for variation (not really
there) in precession of equinoxes
- Other important revolutions going on
- Luther's 95 Theses and Reformation
- Invention of printing press--rise of vernacular
- Journey of Columbus--Europe is not the center of the world?
- Caged in almost Pythagorean secrecy, little courage of
conviction, plagued by doubts and fears of ridicule (but little
threat of religious persecution)
- The Copernican system
- Introduces even more epicylces than Ptolemy! (About
48 vs. 40)
- No real observational improvement over Ptolemy
- Only circular motions
- Sun is displaced from center of orbits--as bad as the
despised equants!
- Born of wealthy merchant parents, influenced by overbearing
uncle Lucas and scandalous brother Andreas
- Studies some astronomy at Univ of Cracow (1490s)
- Studies Canon law at Bologna (1496)
- Studies medicine at Padua (1501)
- Cushy job as Canon of Frauenburg cathedral, few
responsibilities
- Unsocial life largely spent locked away in lonely tower at
Frauenburg
- Few human relationships: lived with housekeeper Anna
Schillings until ordered by Church to get rid of her (Counter
Reformation), one close friend (Giese), one disciple (Rheticus)
- Motivation for heliocentric idea: Ptolemy's equants not in
accord with Aristotelian physics!
- Commentariolus (Little Commentary): preliminary
announcement of heliocentric idea, manuscript only, 1510-1514
- Seven axioms:
- (a)
- Heavenly bodies do not all move round same center
- (b)
- Earth is center of moon's orbit and terrestrial gravity, but
not universe
- (c)
- Sun is the center of the universe
- (d)
- Earth's distance from Sun much smaller than to stars
- (e)
- Earth's rotation causes daily rising and setting
- (f)
- Annual motion of Sun against fixed stars due to Earth's
orbit
- (g)
- Retrograde motion also due to heliocentric orbits
- First Account: written by Rheticus, no mention of
Copernicus by name, 1539
- On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres, 1543, one
of the worst-selling books in history!
- Not placed on Index of forbidden books for 73 years
- Copernicus delays publication for decades, finally gives in to
pressure from Rheticus and Giese
- In dedication to Pope, Copernicus mentions Giese and others
who influenced him, but not Rheticus!
- Rheticus demoted from Dean at Wittenburg to mere cushy Prof at
Leipzig due to his homosexuality
- Leaves publication of Revolutions to pal Osiander
- Osiander views heliocentric idea as mere calculating
hypothesis, does not believe in its truth
- Anonymously adds preface which goes too far in appeasing
theologians: Copernicus merely ``saving the phenomena''
- Died of cerebral hemorrhage 1543, may have just seen published
copy of Revolutions with Osiander's preface
- Hit on idea of ellipse for planetary motions, but for
the wrong reasons and by faulty logic! Crossed out in manuscript
- Given Copernicus' trepidation and lack of originality and
courage, why wasn't heliocentric model hit on earlier?
- Physics wasn't there yet--deficiencies in Aristotle
recognized, but no replacement yet
- Copernicus was really interpreting Ptolemy, not
nature; waste of time to humanist scientists
- Why does Copernicus get all the attention?
- He systematized the heliocentric idea into a
cosmological model (though one rooted in the past)
- Writings attract notoriety (mostly heresay) at the right time
- 2.
- Thomas Digges (1546-1595, England)
- Translated part of Copernicus' Revolutions
- Leader of English Copernicans
- Precise observations of Tycho's (1572) SN
- Lack of parallax implied very large distance
- Added a new idea to Copernican model: infinite space,
with stars at varying distances
This document was generated using the
LaTeX2HTML translator Version 98.1p1 release (March 2nd, 1998)
Copyright © 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997,
Nikos Drakos,
Computer Based Learning Unit, University of Leeds.
The command line arguments were:
latex2html -up_url ../../notes.html -up_title Astronomy 9 Lecture Notes -split 0 -t Astronomy 9 (Spring 2000): Handout 13 -dir /coma8/jbaker/public_html/courses/ay9/week6/handout13 handout13.tex.
The translation was initiated by jonathan baker on 2000-02-23
Up: Astronomy 9 Lecture Notes
jonathan baker
2000-02-23